Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Heidi Hall's avatar

I was puzzled when I found the 'explanation" that these lands were to be sold in order to provide housing. In my home county the ONLY public lands that were NOT proposed for sale were the Forest Service properties surrounding the only town of any substance in the county which is desperately in need of affordable housing for the workers that serve the owners of multi million dollar vacation homes.

Oakie McDoakie's avatar

Maybe I wasn't talking to the "right" people, but here around Taos, the threat to selling off lots of national forest in our Sangre de Cristo and Tusas ranges wasn't making anyone happy. Not at all. And yeah, I don't see how it was going to contribute to affordable housing. Can't live easily on the land Mike Lee, et al. wanted to sell.

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?